Public International Law Tutor: Online Revision and Assessment Support

Start with the authority behind each proposition. Article 38 of the International Court of Justice Statute identifies treaties, custom and general principles, with judicial decisions and scholarly teachings as subsidiary means of determining rules. For custom, distinguish evidence of general practice from acceptance of that practice as law. Repeated action alone is insufficient. [1]

Create an authority card with the proposition, source type, supporting passage and a limitation. Article 59 limits an ICJ decision's binding force to the parties and particular case; that does not mean judgments are useless in later legal reasoning. Explain their role without importing domestic precedent rules. [1]

Use your syllabus to choose coverage: sources, statehood, jurisdiction and immunities, treaties, responsibility, dispute settlement or use of force. Degree modules vary. International obligations and their treatment in domestic courts are different questions; identify the relevant domestic jurisdiction rather than treating England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland as interchangeable.

For treaties, Article 31 combines ordinary meaning, context, object and purpose, alongside its further interpretive considerations. Article 32 gives supplementary means a defined role. For responsibility, identify the underlying obligation separately from attribution and breach under Article 2 of the ILC articles. The articles are not themselves a treaty: check the legal status of the particular rule you use. [2] [3]

Begin with your topic list and assessment instructions. Rate each topic by whether you can explain the rule, locate its authority and apply it without notes. Choose one weak skill for the next session: distinguishing custom from treaty obligations is a more useful target than simply 'revise sources'.

For each revision block, retrieve a rule from memory, check the primary text, then write a short application to a new fictional fact pattern. Record the missing fact that would change your conclusion. Return to that difficulty later without looking at your correction first. Keep a small error log: unsupported proposition, missed condition, misplaced jurisdiction argument or unexplained conclusion. Use this to set your tuition agenda.

In a problem answer, identify the actors, applicable obligation, disputed conduct and requested outcome. Where ICJ proceedings are relevant, investigate the jurisdictional basis rather than assuming every interstate dispute can be heard. Article 36 includes referrals, treaty provisions and optional-clause declarations; examine the relevant terms and limits. Then develop the merits and consequences in distinct stages. [1]

For an essay, answer the evaluative wording with a defensible thesis, not a catalogue of cases. Build each paragraph around a claim, authority, counterargument and reasoned assessment. For a moot or advisory exercise, practise a concise position and answer objections. Follow its actual instructions on time, materials and citations; there is no single assessment format assumed here.

Bring your module outline, permitted assessment guidance and an unassessed practice paragraph that you wrote yourself. A useful first target might be applying a treaty provision without jumping straight to its policy objective. Ask the tutor to identify where your reasoning loses contact with the text and what evidence would strengthen the alternative interpretation. [2]

A focused session can move from your explanation of the rule to a short original exercise, feedback and an independent retry. For online tuition, confirm document-sharing and feedback arrangements; do not assume recordings or particular software. Progress is something you can test: can you now justify the source, apply the conditions and explain uncertainty without prompts?

The published tuition range is £99–£229 per hour. It is not a fixed quote for this subject. Before booking, confirm the proposed tutor's rate, relevant topic experience, session length and arrangements. Describe your level, deadline and priority issue to assess fit; availability and results are not guaranteed.

Undergraduate foundations and postgraduate specialist work may need different expertise. Check syllabus fit rather than assuming every subfield is covered. Tuition should build your understanding, research method and practice technique. Do not request drafting, rewriting or completion of live assessed answers. Keep practice material free of private information; support here is educational, not legal advice on an actual dispute.