Key points
- Identify status, relevant dates and possible claims before writing.
- Keep contractual dismissal and statutory unfairness separate. [2]
- Practise discrimination routes individually, not as interchangeable labels. [3]
- Use feedback to improve your own reasoning, not outsource assessment.
Untangle status and overlapping claims
Start by separating the relationship from the rights being claimed. Acas identifies employee, worker and self-employed status, with classification depending on the agreement and actual working arrangements. Tax status does not necessarily answer the employment-rights question. A contract heading alone is therefore a poor substitute for examining the facts. [1]
Then separate the legal routes. Wrongful dismissal concerns breach of contract, commonly notice; unfair dismissal concerns matters including the reason and fairness of the dismissal. A dismissal may also raise discrimination issues. [2] In revision, give each route its own rule, factual application and provisional conclusion. This prevents one persuasive argument from being treated as an automatic answer to every claim.
- Underline facts about working arrangements before deciding status.
- Write separate headings for contractual breach, statutory unfairness and discrimination.
Choose topics from your actual syllabus
Your module outline should determine the scope of tuition. Possible priorities include status, employment terms, termination, redundancy, equality, workplace rights and collective labour issues. Treat that as a menu to check against your reading list, not a promise that every degree module covers the same material. Identify compulsory topics before spending time on optional detail.
For discrimination revision, make separate entries for direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, harassment and victimisation under the Equality Act framework. [3] Record the precise test taught on your course, the supporting authority and facts that matter. Avoid importing the structure of one route into another. For dismissal, practise distinguishing the employer's stated reason from the fairness of its handling of that reason. [2]
- Bring your syllabus and identify two topics you cannot yet explain unaided.
- Mark readings as core, supplementary or outside the assessed scope.
Build a dated, usable revision framework
Use three study sessions as a starting cycle. First, produce a one-page route map for status and dismissal from memory, then correct it from your materials. Second, create discrimination cards that ask you to identify a route and explain why the alternatives fit less well. Third, attempt a short timed scenario and keep an error log distinguishing missed issues, inaccurate rules and thin application.
Date your materials. Acas reports phased changes under the Employment Rights Act 2025, including a reduction of the ordinary unfair-dismissal qualifying period from two years to six months from 1 January 2027. That change is not yet operative on 4 November 2026. [4] Check commencement and your course's legal cut-off rather than combining present rules and future reforms.
- Retest last session's errors before adding another topic.
- Keep a separate pending-reforms note, with source and effective date.
Sources[4] Acas
Apply the test rather than narrate the dispute
For a problem question, sketch a chronology and list possible claims before drafting. Under each heading, state the relevant test, connect decisive facts to its elements and explain the strongest counterargument. If status or the dismissal reason is uncertain, say which missing fact would change the conclusion. Reserve time for remedies and procedural issues where your syllabus requires them; check applicable dates rather than memorising an undated deadline.
For an essay, turn the title into a proposition you can defend or challenge. Organise paragraphs around arguments, using authorities to support analysis rather than retelling cases. For a practical-style task, follow the audience and format specified in your assessment instructions. These are adaptable study methods, not claims that all employment law assessments share one format.
- Allocate time by the marks and instructions actually provided.
- End each claim with a reasoned, appropriately qualified conclusion.
Use tuition for a demonstrable learning gap
A useful starting request is specific: ‘I can describe unfair dismissal, but I cannot distinguish the reason from procedural fairness in a problem.’ Ask a prospective tutor how they would diagnose that gap and whether they teach your level and jurisdiction. Share an unassessed paragraph or explain your reasoning aloud, subject to your course's rules.
A focused session can work through an original scenario, compare alternative structures and end with a short task you complete independently. For online tuition, discuss how documents and feedback would be shared before booking. The aim is transferable reasoning: you should leave able to explain why a fact matters and then apply that method to a different exercise without prompting.
- Agree one learning objective and a manageable follow-up exercise.
- Ask for feedback on application and structure, not just a corrected conclusion.
Confirm rate, tutor fit and ethical scope
The published tuition range is £99–£229 per hour. It is a range, not a fixed quote for employment law. Confirm the proposed tutor, hourly rate, session length and booking terms before committing. Explain your level, target topics, assessment date and budget so the discussion can focus on an appropriate match; do not assume a tutor or time slot is available.
Tuition supports learning, not submission-ready assessed answers. Tutors should not draft live assessed work or provide legal advice to clients through an academic session. Use invented scenarios and permitted study materials, not confidential workplace files. Between sessions, continue independent reading and timed practice; further tuition should address an identified gap, not become a substitute for doing the work.
- Send a module outline and a clear learning goal without private case details.
- Confirm your institution's assistance rules before sharing assessed material.
A method you can reuse
Reason through an employment law scenario
Follow the numbered sequence to organise your revision and check each link in your reasoning.
Identify jurisdiction, scenario dates and course cut-off.
Analyse status using the agreement and working facts.
Separate contractual, dismissal and equality routes.
Apply each test and address contrary evidence.
Check outcomes and procedural issues within the syllabus.
Private practice · hypothetical question
Original exercise: two routes after a dismissal
Original private-revision hypothetical. Assume an England and Wales scenario dated May 2026. Noor is an employee with three years of continuous service. Her contract provides four weeks' notice. A manager dismisses her immediately for allegedly missing two shifts, relying on a screenshot of the rota. Noor says the shifts were swapped with approval, but the manager neither asks for her messages nor offers a meeting or appeal. No other facts are supplied. In an unassessed practice answer, outline separate wrongful-dismissal and unfair-dismissal analyses. Identify the evidence you would request and explain why the absence of notice does not, by itself, resolve both routes. This is a fictional learning exercise, not advice.
Work through your own response first, then reveal a hint or compare your reasoning with the self-review. Each panel opens independently.
Hint 1
Separate the contractual notice issue from statutory fairness.
Hint 2
Do not assume that an allegation proves misconduct.
Hint 3
Explain what the messages and rota could establish.
Reveal the self-review answer
A self-review answer should treat contractual breach, commonly notice, separately from the reason and fairness of dismissal. [2] Investigate whether the circumstances justified dismissal without notice rather than assuming either outcome. Examine the rota, swap approval and Noor's account, then analyse the handling of the allegation and appeal. State what remains uncertain and avoid promising success. Use the May 2026 legal position and your course materials, not a future qualifying-period rule. [4]
Read alongside the page references: [2], [4].
For private practice and educational self-review only, not a live or assessed submission. This is not legal advice or a prediction of a legal outcome. Check current authorities, your syllabus and your institution’s assessment rules. No response is collected or sent by this practice tool.
Common questions
Frequently asked questions
How much does employment law tuition cost?
The published range is £99–£229 per hour. Your employment law rate and tutor match must be confirmed before booking. Ask about session duration and booking terms, and set a budget around specific learning goals rather than assuming a fixed package price.
Can I request online employment law tuition?
Yes, you can request an online tutor match. Confirm availability and how you would share permitted materials and receive feedback. An unassessed paragraph, a topic map or an original scenario can give an online session a clear focus.
How should I revise unfair and wrongful dismissal?
Keep two separate checklists. Wrongful dismissal concerns contractual breach, commonly notice; unfair dismissal examines matters including the reason and fair procedure. [2] Practise the same fictional dismissal under both routes, checking the scenario date and your course's legal cut-off. [4]
Is this suitable for my degree level or module?
Suitability depends on the tutor and your syllabus, not the subject name alone. Share your undergraduate or postgraduate level, jurisdiction, reading list and assessment format. Confirm experience with those requirements before booking; employment law modules differ in scope and emphasis.
Will a tutor write my assessment or advise on my workplace dispute?
No. Tuition is for independent learning, permitted feedback and original practice exercises, not drafting live assessed answers or advising clients. Check your academic rules. If you need advice on a real dispute, use an appropriate advice service rather than an academic tutoring session.
One-to-one support
Plan focused Employment Law tuition
Tell us your module, jurisdiction, assessment format and the point you want to improve. Confirm the tutor match, session objective and £99–£229 hourly rate before booking. Your learning and assessed work remain your own.