Skip to content
Law tutoring

Company Law Tutor: Online Revision and Assessment Support

Company Law revision becomes more manageable when you can explain who owns the asset, who owes the duty and who can seek a remedy. Targeted online tuition can help you turn statutory provisions and cases into reasoned problem answers, rather than another set of notes. Bring your module outline, assessment instructions and a practice attempt to identify where your reasoning stalls. The focus here is England and Wales; degree syllabuses and other jurisdictions need separate checking before a tutor match is confirmed.

Request a tutor matchTry the practice check

Online tuition: £99–£229 per hour. Your rate, tutor match and availability are confirmed before booking.

7 minute read
Updated 4 November 2026
UK-focused guidance

The short answer

A Company Law tutor can help you distinguish corporate personality, directors' duties and shareholder remedies, then practise applying them to unfamiliar facts. Choose support around your actual difficulty: statutory interpretation, identifying the right claimant, essay evaluation or timed writing. Confirm the tutor's subject experience, teaching approach and hourly rate before booking.

Key points

  • Separate the company, directors and members before choosing a claim.
  • Link each statutory rule to facts, exceptions and a possible remedy.
  • Use short practice attempts and an error log between sessions.
  • Published rates are £99–£229/hour; confirm fit and price first.

Untangle ownership, duties and the right claimant

Start with a party diagram. A company has rights, liabilities and property distinct from its shareholders; owning every share does not itself make company property the shareholder's property. Keep that distinction visible when a hypothetical mixes personal borrowing, company assets and a controlling director. It prevents a discussion of fairness from replacing the required legal analysis. [4]

Next ask to whom the relevant duty is owed. Sections 171–177 of the Companies Act 2006 set out general directors' duties owed to the company. Several duties can apply to one event, so identifying a conflict does not finish the analysis. For section 172, read the statutory considerations rather than equating success with immediate profit. [1]

  • Mark each person as company, director, member or outsider.
  • Write the alleged wrong and proposed claimant before listing authorities.

Sources[1] The National Archives, legislation.gov.uk[4] UK Supreme Court

Build coverage around your Company Law syllabus

Bring the reading list before agreeing coverage. A useful topic checklist includes incorporation and personality, the constitution, corporate decision-making, directors' duties, shares and capital, and member remedies. Add insolvency, corporate governance or reform debates only where your module requires them. Coverage and depth should follow your course, not an assumed universal exam syllabus.

For remedies, distinguish a member's derivative claim seeking relief for the company from an unfair-prejudice petition concerning members' interests. In England and Wales, continuing a statutory derivative claim requires court permission. Section 994 has its own unfair-prejudice test, and section 996 permits remedies including a share purchase order; neither route guarantees relief. Part 11 contains separate Scottish provisions. [2] [3]

  • Compare claimant, protected interest, threshold and relief for each route.
  • Flag missing facts instead of treating every shareholder dispute alike.

Sources[2] The National Archives, legislation.gov.uk[3] The National Archives, legislation.gov.uk

Use a revision cycle that exposes weak reasoning

First audit your topics against the module outline: can you state the rule, locate the provision and apply it without reading your notes? Choose one weak topic and one stronger topic for each study block. Create a compact rule sheet with the statutory section, a relevant case principle, an exception and a fact that would change the conclusion.

Then alternate closed-note recall with short hypothetical applications. For directors' duties, contrast taking an outside business opportunity with having an interest in a proposed contract with the company: section 175 excludes conflicts arising from transactions with the company, while section 177 addresses proposed-transaction disclosure, subject to exceptions. Record why you chose the provision. [1]

  • Retest mistakes after a gap using changed facts.
  • Track errors as rule, application, claimant, remedy or timing problems.

Sources[1] The National Archives, legislation.gov.uk

Practise problem answers, essays and practical tasks differently

For a problem answer, outline the parties and issues before writing. State a precise rule, apply the decisive facts, consider the strongest counterargument and give a qualified conclusion. Return to the claimant and remedy at the end of each issue. If the articles, approval history or financial position are missing, explain why the missing information matters rather than inventing it.

For an essay, define the proposition being tested and take a defensible position. An essay on directors' accountability could distinguish the content of duties from the mechanisms for enforcing them. Use authority to evaluate your argument, not as a catalogue of case summaries. For a course-set practical task, identify its audience and required format before applying the same disciplined reasoning.

  • Allocate time using your assessment's marks and instructions.
  • Practise with the permitted materials and your course's citation rules.

Choose tuition that leaves you able to work independently

A focused session should begin with a specific goal, such as distinguishing shareholder remedies or improving application under section 174. A short, unassessed attempt lets the tutor see whether the obstacle is understanding, selection of authority or writing. Ask for explanations that require you to justify your choices rather than simply receive a model paragraph.

Agree a session structure: diagnose an error, discuss the rule, attempt changed facts and review your reasoning. Online work can use a shared party diagram or an annotated statutory extract. Finish with a small independent task and a self-review checklist. You should leave knowing what to practise next and how to recognise improvement without needing tuition for every topic.

  • Ask how feedback will address your particular assessment format.
  • Bring permitted materials and anonymised practice work, not confidential client documents.

Confirm the rate, subject fit and ethical boundaries

The current published range is £99–£229 per hour. Your tutor match and individual rate must be confirmed before booking; this is not a fixed-fee package or a promise of availability. Explain your level, jurisdiction, deadline, topic gaps and budget so the proposed support can be checked against your needs.

Request a clear first-session goal and ask what preparation would make that session worthwhile. Tuition supports your learning; it does not include writing live assessed answers, completing submissions or advising clients on company disputes. Follow your assessment's rules on outside assistance. No tutor can guarantee marks, and independent reading and practice remain essential.

  • Share your module outline and one concrete learning difficulty.
  • Confirm teaching scope, rate and booking terms before committing.

A method you can reuse

From company facts to a reasoned answer

Follow the numbered sequence to organise your revision and check each link in your reasoning.

  1. Identify the company, directors and members

  2. Separate ownership from control

  3. Select the duty and statutory conditions

  4. Test facts, exceptions and missing information

  5. Choose claimant, procedure and possible relief

  6. Write and self-review a qualified conclusion

Private practice · hypothetical question

Original practice: an opportunity and a minority member

Original private-revision hypothetical. Assume an England and Wales problem involving a solvent private company. A director learns about a potential supply opportunity through her role and takes it for a separate business she owns. She says the company lacked funds to pursue it. A minority member wants any recovered profit paid directly to him. The facts say nothing about authorisation, the articles or any wider conduct affecting his membership interests. In an unassessed twelve-minute plan, identify the possible duty, explain whose interests it protects and distinguish two potential member remedies. State the extra facts you would need. This is a learning exercise, not advice on a real dispute.

Work through your own response first, then reveal a hint or compare your reasoning with the self-review. Each panel opens independently.

Hint 1

Read section 175(2) before treating lack of funds as decisive.

Hint 2

Distinguish the company's claim from the member's personal objective.

Hint 3

Do not assume authorisation or an unfair-prejudice case is established.

Reveal the self-review answer

Section 175 is a starting point: inability to exploit an opportunity does not itself exclude the duty. Check any effective authorisation and other relevant duties. General duties are owed to the company. A derivative claim seeks relief on its behalf and requires permission to continue in England and Wales. A section 994 petition needs its own unfair-prejudice analysis; minority status alone establishes neither route nor entitlement to a personal payment. [1] [2] [3]

Read alongside the page references: [1], [2], [3].

For private practice and educational self-review only, not a live or assessed submission. This is not legal advice or a prediction of a legal outcome. Check current authorities, your syllabus and your institution’s assessment rules. No response is collected or sent by this practice tool.

Common questions

Frequently asked questions

How much does Company Law tuition cost?

The published range is £99–£229/hour. Confirm the individual tutor's rate and suitability before booking. Explain your priority topic and budget so you can discuss a focused session rather than assume a package is necessary.

Can I study Company Law with a tutor online?

Online tuition can support statutory reading, party diagrams and discussion of your unassessed practice answers. Ask how materials will be shared and feedback delivered. Agree the session format and confirm a suitable tutor match before booking.

Can I focus only on directors' duties or shareholder remedies?

Yes, you can request a narrowly focused learning goal. For remedies, practise distinguishing relief for the company through a derivative claim from the protection of members' interests under section 994. Bring your syllabus so the relevant depth can be agreed. [2] [3]

Is this suitable for my level and jurisdiction?

Explain whether you need introductory degree support, advanced module revision or a particular course task. This page focuses on England and Wales, not identical rules across the UK. A tutor's experience with your syllabus and assessment format must be checked.

Will a tutor write my assessed Company Law answer?

No. Support should develop your own understanding through original exercises, explanations and permitted feedback. A tutor should not draft live assessed answers or provide client legal advice. Check your course's assistance rules before sharing assessed work.

One-to-one support

Plan focused Company Law tuition

Tell us your module, jurisdiction, assessment format and the point you want to improve. Confirm the tutor match, session objective and £99–£229 hourly rate before booking. Your learning and assessed work remain your own.

Continue reading

Related guidance

Law tutoring7 min

Commercial Law Tutor: Online Revision and Assessment Support

Commercial Law revision becomes more manageable when you can explain who owns the goods, who bears a loss and which remedy follows from a breach. Seek focused online tuition to practise those decisions rather than memorise disconnected statutory sections. Bring your module outline and one specific difficulty, such as retention of title or agency authority. The focus here is England and Wales; your course content, assessment rules and tutor match should be checked before booking.

Explore support
Law tutoring8 min

Contract Law Tutor UK

One-to-one contract law tuition for UK university and conversion-course students who want to connect doctrine, authority and factual application more confidently. Sessions are shaped around your current module and legitimate practice needs, not a generic answer template.

Explore support
Law tutoring7 min

Equity and Trusts Tutor: Online Revision and Assessment Support

Equity and Trusts revision becomes more manageable when you separate the questions: was a trust created, what interest does each person hold, which duty applies, and what remedy follows? Targeted tuition can help you practise that sequence instead of memorising disconnected case summaries. Bring your syllabus, a difficult topic and your own practice attempt to discuss a suitable tutor match. This page focuses on England and Wales law; confirm jurisdiction, course coverage and assessment requirements before booking.

Explore support
Law tutoring7 min

Banking and Finance Law Tutor: Online Revision and Assessment Support

Banking and Finance Law revision needs more than a list of financial regulations. You need to identify who owes which duty, read the transaction documents and apply the right authority to the facts. Targeted tuition can help you connect those tasks through original payment and lending scenarios, focused essay plans and timed practice. Start with your module outline, assessment format and one difficult topic so that the proposed tutor match addresses your actual course rather than a generic finance syllabus.

Explore support

Editorial details

Published by The Law Tutors

Updated 4 November 2026. Educational information only; students should check current assessment and institutional rules.

References

  1. [1]Companies Act 2006: general duties of directors — The National Archives, legislation.gov.uk
  2. [2]Companies Act 2006: derivative claims and proceedings — The National Archives, legislation.gov.uk
  3. [3]Companies Act 2006: protection of members against unfair prejudice — The National Archives, legislation.gov.uk
  4. [4]Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd: judgment on corporate personality — UK Supreme Court